6/25/2008 | Team Name | Points | Waiver | Moves | |
1 | O.N. Thugs | 107.5 | 1.5 | 11 | 50 |
2 | IStillSuckCurveballs | 103.5 | 0.5 | 8 | 9 |
3 | IamJabrone | 98 | 2.5 | 12 | 38 |
4 | TheJimmyDixLongballs | 97.5 | -0.5 | 9 | 8 |
5 | Black Sox | 96.5 | -1.5 | 7 | 20 |
6 | 90 Reds | 88.5 | -3.5 | 2 | 32 |
7 | Milwaukee Whiffers | 78 | 0 | 5 | 19 |
8 | Phatsnapper | 76 | -0.5 | 1 | 9 |
9 | Muddy Mud Skippers | 53.5 | 0 | 4 | 10 |
9 | Cheeseheads | 53.5 | 0 | 6 | 15 |
11 | Westy's Slugs | 52.5 | 1 | 3 | 39 |
12 | Benver Droncos | 31 | 0.5 | 10 | 30 |
These are the standings for our league as of June 25th. For the past two weeks the top five spots have been fairly consistent, with C-Lauff and Roland fighting over first and O.D. making a strong run at the top of the order too. What's most interesting for me has been watching the many many moves of teams like the Thugs and Jambrone and wondering if I should be adopting the same strategy.
I mean, think about it. Is it normal that 40% of the top 5 teams have made less than 10 moves, while 2 of the 3 teams with the most moves are also in the top 3 of the league?
Unfortunately for me, this kind of rapid player-swap isn't included in any of my long-term plans. Part of this is that I'm still new to the fantasy baseball scene and still learning which players are for real and which are flukes. Most of it is personality - My memory can't really retain obscure stats and player info that well.
I'll just put it out there - is there a strong advantage in making frequent player moves? Are these low-move teams sitting in the top 5 just injury-bombs waiting to happen? With constraints such as time and / or knowledge is there a greater value in using your "Move" utility in trading than working the waiver?
It'd be interesting to track the number of trades made and the number of waiver moves made. It's probably in there somewhere.